Good grief, not again

[Deleted]

^ You just act normal till you become President and than you take over the world. JK

[historyman12]

Jul 27, 2008 2:13:13 GMT -5 LiveInThaskyE said:

Yes,I want to serve you in your new regime,but I will NOT drink soymilk. Ew.

Same here.

However, Spirit Mage, as you are not quite yet ruler of the world, I offer some suggestions.

Create a universal language. All other languages should be allowed to exist, but this would be a mandatory language. Communication aided

Cell Phones should have a mandatory volume and time limit. Any further, and they send electrical charges into the annoyance using them.

Dogs should be illegal to dress up.

Criminals convicted of murder/rape/etc. should be banished to Alaska and forced to work in labor camps until they die. Bill O'Reilly's idea.

Criminals guilty of lesser, but still serious crimes should also become soldiers for a time equivalent to their jail sentence.

For misdemeanor criminals, bring back the stocks baby! ;D

On the education system: What of people whose skills lie in areas such as entertainment? (Writers, actors, comedians, TV show hosts, Elvis impersonators) How will they be gauged?

Oh, and, I volunteer to whip up your army in return for a position of prominence. Or somesuch.

Economics must be a healthy capitalism. Not overdone, government must keep an eye on business, illegalize conglomerates, but no socialism.

Oh, and, keep tabs on religion. Not WBC, no Islamic radicals, no super-arrogant atheists.

Good suggestions?

[spiritmage234]

@femble: Naw. I wouldn't want to rule the whole world all at once.

I want to erase the mistakes of the past, then make a a relatively more peaceful world. Then hopefully, my sphere of influence will spread to the rest of the world.

It'll be like communsim, but also like totolitarianism.

Actually, my system, will be more like meritocracy.

I will govern by your merit and morality rather than wealth and power.


If people weren't so stupid, I'd like to take the Buddhist socialist angle.

@history: I am totally for the international establishment of Esperanto.

That's why it was developed after all.

[Deleted]

I was jokeing but your idea of letting spread around the world peacefully is better than anything I would come up with.
What do you think on religion I'm a christian I would say I'm radical to a degree but only within the boundinries of my church and family.

[spiritmage234]

Jul 27, 2008 17:41:20 GMT -5 @femble91 said:

I was jokeing but your idea of letting spread around the world peacefully is better than anything I would come up with.
What do you think on religion I'm a christian I would say I'm radical to a degree but only within the boundinries of my church and family.

On the basis of religion,

so long as you're not some loud@$$ fundalmentalist who actually enacts their beliefs - while disturbing the peace - on the world in an overly negative manner (like, murdering non-believers), and in the end, you're only benefiting other radical fundalmentalists such as yourself, then you may worship as you please.

[Deleted]

^ I like the way you think.

[historyman12]

Jul 27, 2008 17:31:13 GMT -5 @spiritmage234 said:

@femble: Naw. I wouldn't want to rule the whole world all at once.

I want to erase the mistakes of the past, then make a a relatively more peaceful world. Then hopefully, my sphere of influence will spread to the rest of the world.

It'll be like communsim, but also like totolitarianism.

Actually, my system, will be more like meritocracy.

I will govern by your merit and morality rather than wealth and power.


If people weren't so stupid, I'd like to take the Buddhist socialist angle.

@history: I am totally for the international establishment of Esperanto.

That's why it was developed after all.

Okay. I vote English though, I mean, our supreme over-lord-ess speaks it eh? Oh, and, meritocracies can lead to some deceptive people. Morals can be faked, as well as anything else. Oh, and, will you take my stocks idea? Please?

[spiritmage234]

Well, I'd rather go for a constructed international auxillary language such as Esperanto, becuase it was specifically developed so then a Spanish speaking person and a Korean speaking person can communicate, even if the former doesn't know Korean and the latter doesn't know Spanish. You'd still have to learn it, but at least everybody will know something in common, and, it's not picking favorites, just because one language - such as English - is spoken by a lot more people, and that language did not originate from a group of people who "conquered" half of the world, language and all. No hard feelings.

Foreign policy.
I'm going back to the philosophy of the first (George Washington):
Stay out of other countrys' business.
Non of this Truman, or whatever president established the "world police" status.

But if I must bring aide to humanity, I only have one solution:
Singen und Tanzen.

Observe:


Proof that the only time people from around the world don't care about anything is when they are singing and dancing.