|
Post by marvel26 on Oct 13, 2007 23:19:05 GMT -5
Why, thank you.
Bringing a smile to a person's face, no matter how that person may take it, puts one on mine.
An open ended conclusion, oxymoron right there, seems the most feasible from a marketing stand point.
You put a full stop to your story and there is a chance that you'll lose your fanbase if that particular punctuation could have been used later.
"You gotta keep'em wanting more" is the sentence of the day here.
|
|
|
Post by marvel26 on Oct 13, 2007 23:20:58 GMT -5
I fail to see how two people talking to each other equals a canon moment They did talk. They're not mute ya know. The talking? Its canon. It's the manner in which they talked that's up for debate.
|
|
|
Post by bagpipe turtle on Oct 13, 2007 23:21:22 GMT -5
I fail to see how two people talking to each other equals a canon moment Just pointing this out, but doesn't that logic make 90% of Kataang moments not canon, too?
|
|
|
Post by mike1921 on Oct 13, 2007 23:22:49 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure he meant them platonically/casually talking.
|
|
|
Post by bagpipe turtle on Oct 13, 2007 23:24:35 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure he meant them platonically/casually talking. One could argue that many of Katara and Aang's interactions are platonic (or seem to be). *is shot*
|
|
|
Post by cyrrylia on Oct 13, 2007 23:25:48 GMT -5
I would argue something like that. Even the "romantic hintings" seem one sided, and could be said to not be mutually "romantic" in that sense.
|
|
|
Post by mindbender18 on Oct 13, 2007 23:26:32 GMT -5
I fail to see how two people talking to each other equals a canon moment Just pointing this out, but doesn't that logic make 90% of Kataang moments not canon, too? that's exactly what i'm talking about. they could, but they'll still be wrong about it
|
|
Ana
Metalbending Cop
Posts: 5,061
|
Post by Ana on Oct 13, 2007 23:26:44 GMT -5
That’s going too far. You can disagree with opinions but don’t be disrespectful to the person who has the opinion. Also, to continue the mod note, please use the "modify" button instead of double posting marvel26. Though you are right about one thing: the all ATLA magazine confirmed that the romance won’t be open ended with at least Katara. I suppose that kills some pairings but at least the writers are finishing what they set up.
|
|
|
Post by marvel26 on Oct 13, 2007 23:27:28 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure he meant them platonically/casually talking. One could argue that many of Katara and Aang's interactions are platonic (or seem to be). *is shot* You don't have to argue. Do we really want to devolve the atmosphere here any further? Duly noted.
|
|
|
Post by cyrrylia on Oct 13, 2007 23:32:10 GMT -5
I don't understand this comment.
|
|
|
Post by bagpipe turtle on Oct 13, 2007 23:32:40 GMT -5
One could argue that many of Katara and Aang's interactions are platonic (or seem to be). *is shot* You don't have to argue. Do we really want to devolve the atmosphere here any further? Technically speaking, I wasn't arguing that statement, I was pointing out a perspective some people could take on this issue. But I'm going to leave now, sorry about... um... "devolving" your atmosphere. *backs away*
|
|
|
Post by marvel26 on Oct 13, 2007 23:34:11 GMT -5
You don't have to argue. Do we really want to devolve the atmosphere here any further? Technically speaking, I wasn't arguing that statement, I was pointing out a perspective some people could take on this issue. But I'm going to leave now, sorry about... um... "devolving" your atmosphere. *backs away* Oh no. I didn't mean that. I was just trying to avoid any truly nasty remarks being flung from both sides. It's the way I word myself I suppose Give me enough rope and I'll hang myself 10 tens out of 9.
|
|
|
Post by taiyo *on limited hiatus* on Oct 13, 2007 23:45:11 GMT -5
*sighs* No. No rope. *pats Marvel26 on shoulder*
|
|
Maylene
Avatar Roku
Icon by hermonthis from livejournal
Posts: 1,280
|
Post by Maylene on Oct 13, 2007 23:49:37 GMT -5
All of u are hilarious. and no, they're not going to leave the shipping open-ended That's nice. I was suggesting it. And I don't think it's fair to include all of us, when I've obviously stated that I don't think Taang is going to happen in the canon. And who said that we think Taang is canon from one talk while Kataang isn't?
|
|
|
Post by bagpipe turtle on Oct 14, 2007 0:03:34 GMT -5
Technically speaking, I wasn't arguing that statement, I was pointing out a perspective some people could take on this issue. But I'm going to leave now, sorry about... um... "devolving" your atmosphere. *backs away* Oh no. I didn't mean that. I was just trying to avoid any truly nasty remarks being flung from both sides. It's the way I word myself I suppose Give me enough rope and I'll hang myself 10 tens out of 9. Oh, no, I was just clarifying myself on that. Trying not to start a war or anything. Uh, let's not. No rope here.
|
|